• kautau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Do they have a patreon? I think part of Nintendo’s extermination policy is “if you try to make money from it, it’s lost revenue, and we will murder you.” For example dolphin has been around forever, but always open source and without a patreon or the like

    EDIT:

    Answered my own question

    RIP

    https://www.patreon.com/ryujinx

    • Drasglaf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Just speculation, but there must be a reason why they target Yuzu but not Ryujinx. Maybe because Ryujinx is open source and there is nothing illegal in the code?

      Edit: A word.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        8 months ago

        But yuzu is open source as well: https://github.com/yuzu-emu/yuzu

        My guess is they are just tackling one thing at a time, and ryujinx is next on their chopping block. It’s entirely possible they’ve already sent cease and desist notices to to ryujinx

        • yamanii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          If Yuzu is open source why is the public version way behind the patreon one? Legit question, this must be why it’s a prime target since Ryujinx doesn’t do that, there’s only one version.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Nintendo’s argument in the filing is that Yuzu is designed primarily for circumventing the Switch’s encryption (a.k.a. copyright protection measures). Their justification is that Yuzu uses prod.keys to decrypt various things like the ROM filesystems and the system firmware*. Ryujinx also uses prod.keys, so they would be just as legitimate of a target for that argument as Yuzu is.

        Personally, I think they chose to go after Yuzu first because it’s more popular and runs at playable framerates on modern Android devices. If the lawsuit goes in Nintendo’s favor, I guarantee they’ll immediately use that precident to make the same argument against and swiftly kill Ryujinx.

        *This is actually a valid argument that is not affected by past suits like Bleem v. Sony.