All posts/comments by me are licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

  • 0 Posts
  • 40 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle







  • You’re again assuming that being a windows clone will intrinsically make a DE more intuitive.

    Yes I am, and I base that on my observance of human nature, and how a level of complexity of learning something new is a barrier that affects adopting something new, as well as my own personal experience as a UI/UX software developer for some decades.

    An alternative UX would have to be incredibly intuitive to overcome that. And, with respect, Gnome is not that.

    I don’t think that’s true at all.

    Well we’ll just agree to disagree then. Appreciate the discussion though.


  • I reject the premise that just because more people use Windows, a Windows UX must be the most intuitive and alternatives must appear more complicated to use.

    That’s one hell of a ‘heavy lift’ to create a non-Windows UX experience that is more intuitive and easier for Windows user to adapt to that is completely different from the Windows UX experience they know today.

    Not saying it’s not possible, but I think you’d have better success in pulling people over from Windows to Linux if the UX experience was similar, since they’re already dealing with a retraining issue (Linux) that is a barrier they have to overcome when transferring over.

    There’s no need to add more obstacles to that transference process.






  • It’s not so much a circlejerk as much as a knowledge that KDE plasma is the most approachable DE with the most polished first experience for the majority of new users

    You say that like it’s a fact rather than just your personal opinion.

    It’s a safe assumption to make though, based on the fact that KDE most closely mimics the Windows UX, which Gnome does not, and that the vast majority of human beings who use computers are most familiar with the Windows UX, hence most approachable.




  • And no, it’s not preventing input to improve a product, it’s asking you to be less absolutist in your comments. “It doesn’t work as well as it should” compared to your “it doesn’t work”. When it obviously does work, albeit could work better.

    Can you please stop editing your previous comments to add a new point that can be responded to, and reply instead?

    To your point that I quoted above, which is your second edit, they didn’t work for me, at all.

    I’m not going to say it doesn’t work well when it doesn’t work at all, I’m going to say it doesn’t work at all.

    Seven plus attempts is more than enough for any human being to try to get a link to work, and honestly, links are supposed to work on the first try, or or maybe even the second try if the server is being slammed.


  • EDIT: No, you didn’t state that it didn’t work after seven minutes and multiple routs of attempting to get the link to resolve. I see that you have edited that in later, in one of the later comments.

    I stated in my origional comment (link, or see below) that it didn’t work for me. After having read one of your comments about refreshing, I went back and added (and stated in the edit that I forgot to mention the steps / how many times I tried) for others who would read later more detail about it. I clarified on how many times I tried, and did not add something new from scratch to make a point.

    You’re being intellectually dishonest.

    What I added in…

    Edit: forgot to mention, I tried reloading twice, went back and re-clicked a couple of times, as well as when I did my reply I embedded that original link into the reply and then I tried it again from there, so I tried to resolve the link a bunch of times over a seven-minute period.